From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Love

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Jun 17, 2021
252 A.3d 489 (D.C. 2021)

Opinion

No. 21-BG-235

06-17-2021

IN RE Jonathan Frederick Seamon LOVE A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Registration No. 424085


ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order from the state of Maryland accepting respondent's joint petition and indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction with the right to seek reinstatement after 90 days; this court's April 22, 2021, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing him to show cause why equivalent reciprocal discipline in the form of a 90-day suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed; no response having been filed; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing respondent filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Richard Frederick Seamon Love is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 90 days, nunc pro tunc to May 12, 2021, with reinstatement contingent on a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).


Summaries of

In re Love

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Jun 17, 2021
252 A.3d 489 (D.C. 2021)
Case details for

In re Love

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JONATHAN FREDERICK SEAMON LOVE A Member of the Bar of the District…

Court:DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Jun 17, 2021

Citations

252 A.3d 489 (D.C. 2021)
2021 DDN 7

Citing Cases

In re Love

PER CURIAM On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel's Report regarding petitioner's petition for…

In re Love

PER CURIAM On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel's Report regarding petitioner's petition for…