In re Lombardy

2 Citing cases

  1. In re King

    No. 23-30667 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Mar. 29, 2024)

    Nor should the court ignore a provision lest it "offend [] the well-settled rule that all parts of a statute, if possible, are to be given effect." In re Lombardy, Case No. 11-17737, 2012 WL 435816 *4 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio Feb. 9, 2012), quoting Fidelity Fed. Sav & Loan Ass'n v. de la Cuesta, 458 U.S. 141, 163 (1982).

  2. In re DeVries

    650 B.R. 869 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2023)

    Nor should the court ignore a provision lest it "offend[ ] the well-settled rule that all parts of a statute, if possible, are to be given effect." In re Lombardy , Case No. 11-17737, 2012 WL 435816 *4 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2012) (quoting Fidelity Fed. Sav & Loan Ass'n v. de la Cuesta , 458 U.S. 141, 163, 102 S.Ct. 3014, 73 L.Ed.2d 664 (1982) ).