From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Loftus v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 30, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1136 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93811

Decided and Entered: October 30, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner's application for disability retirement benefits.

E. Peter Pfaff, East Aurora, for petitioner.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Spain, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT


Petitioner was employed by the Erie County Health Department as a nutritionist and breast-feeding coordinator. She sustained spinal injuries as the result of an October 1988 motor vehicle accident, which caused her to miss three months of work. Her symptoms of pain and numbness persisted until she resigned from her employment, applying for disability retirement benefits in February 1998. Her application was denied on the ground that she was neither physically nor mentally incapacitated from performing her job. Claimant then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the determination.

In our view, the record contains substantial evidence supporting the determination, based upon credible medical evidence presented by the Retirement System, that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing her job-related duties, notwithstanding contrary medical evidence presented by petitioner. Accordingly, since respondent has the authority to evaluate and resolve conflicts in medical opinion ( see Matter of Decker v. McCall, 305 A.D.2d 782, 783, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 51 [Sept. 16, 2003]), the decision denying her application for disability retirement benefits will not be disturbed ( see Matter of Chrysler v. McCall, 292 A.D.2d 700, 701, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 611). The remaining contentions raised by petitioner have been reviewed and do not warrant a contrary outcome.

Crew III, J.P., Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Loftus v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 30, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1136 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re Loftus v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF PATRICIA LOFTUS, Petitioner, v. H. CARL McCALL, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 30, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 1136 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 918

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Collins

The record contains substantial evidence supporting the Comptroller's determination, based upon credible…