From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Litman

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 6, 2020
2019-2157 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2020)

Opinion

2019-2157

03-06-2020

IN RE: MARK ALAN LITMAN, Appellant

MARK ALAN LITMAN, Mark A. Litman & Associates, P.A., Edina, MN, argued pro se. DANIEL KAZHDAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by AMY J. NELSON, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/805,863.

JUDGMENT

MARK ALAN LITMAN, Mark A. Litman & Associates, P.A., Edina, MN, argued pro se. DANIEL KAZHDAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by AMY J. NELSON, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, PLAGER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 6, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Litman

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 6, 2020
2019-2157 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2020)
Case details for

In re Litman

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: MARK ALAN LITMAN, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 6, 2020

Citations

2019-2157 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2020)