From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Levenstein

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 10, 2017
2017-1067 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2017)

Opinion

2017-1067

10-10-2017

IN RE: LAWRENCE M. LEVENSTEIN, Appellant

JOHN S. NAGY, II, Fulwider Patton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SARAH E. CRAVEN.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/212,998.

JUDGMENT

JOHN S. NAGY, II, Fulwider Patton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SARAH E. CRAVEN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O'MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 10, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Levenstein

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 10, 2017
2017-1067 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2017)
Case details for

In re Levenstein

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: LAWRENCE M. LEVENSTEIN, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 10, 2017

Citations

2017-1067 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2017)