From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re LeVan

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 6, 1939
4 A.2d 280 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Argued October 18th, 1938.

Decided February 6th, 1939.

On appeal from the prerogative court, whose opinion is reported in 123 N.J. Eq. 463.

Messrs. Carey Lane ( Mr. Robert Carey and Mr. Harry Lane, of counsel), for the appellant.

Mr. Rudolph A. Huebner, for the respondent Joseph H. LeVan.


We have examined and considered with care the evidence and stipulation exhibited by the state of the case herein, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and we conclude that the decree of the prerogative court, advised by Vice-Ordinary Berry, is fully justified, and such decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

In re LeVan

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 6, 1939
4 A.2d 280 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

In re LeVan

Case Details

Full title:In the matter of the appeal from the decree of the orphans court of the…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 6, 1939

Citations

4 A.2d 280 (N.J. 1939)
4 A.2d 280

Citing Cases

Whitney v. Lott

In like cases, the determination of the survivorship is often perplexing and enigmatic. Cf. In re Le Van, 123…

In re Raynolds

"The circumstances upon which a conclusion is based must themselves be facts; they are of no value if they in…