Opinion
No. 17-2344
01-22-2018
In re: BRANDON LEE, Petitioner.
Brandon Lee, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brandon Lee, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Brandon Lee petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the Supreme Court of North Carolina to rule on his state mandamus petition. We conclude that Lee is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials. Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg Cty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969).
The relief sought by Lee is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED