From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Law

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2019
No. 19-1190 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-1190

04-30-2019

In re: JAMEL LAW, Petitioner.

Jamel Law, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel J. Olinghouse, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:10-cr-00477-CMH-2) Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamel Law, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel J. Olinghouse, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jamel Law petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motions to correct clear error and for consideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Law

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2019
No. 19-1190 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2019)
Case details for

In re Law

Case Details

Full title:In re: JAMEL LAW, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 30, 2019

Citations

No. 19-1190 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2019)