From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Laplante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 2010
70 A.D.3d 1039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 2009-03606, (Docket No. O-4552-09).

February 23, 2010.

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ross, J.H.O.), dated April 16, 2009, which dismissed the petition.

Jeffrey C. Bluth, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Dillon, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We reject the petitioner's contention that the Family Court should have amended his petition sua sponte to include an allegation that the respondent slapped him. A pleading may be amended to conform to the proof, unless the amendment would prejudice the opposing party ( see CPLR 3025 [c]). Here, such an amendment would have prejudiced the respondent because, without notice of the factual allegation, she could not prepare her case.


Summaries of

In re Laplante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 23, 2010
70 A.D.3d 1039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Laplante

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HERODE LAPLANTE, Appellant, v. NADINE LAPLANTE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 23, 2010

Citations

70 A.D.3d 1039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 1650
894 N.Y.S.2d 775

Citing Cases

Mangaroo v. Beckman

The plaintiffs remaining challenge to the jury charge is not preserved for appellate review ( see Schlecter v…

Batista v. Iqbal

At a fact-finding hearing pursuant to Family Court Act article 8 to determine whether a family offense has…