Opinion
NO. 02-13-00055-CV
03-21-2013
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
The court has considered relator's pro se petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that it has no jurisdiction over the relief requested. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2012); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. proceeding); In re Watson, 253 S.W.3d 319, 320 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2008, orig. proceeding) (holding that if an applicant finds it necessary to complain about an action or inaction of the convicting court in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding, an applicant may seek mandamus relief from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals).
--------
PER CURIAM PANEL: GARDNER, DAUPHINOT, and GABRIEL, JJ.