From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lafaye

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 17, 2023
23-cv-03089-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-03089-JD

08-17-2023

LAFAYE, Plaintiff,


ORDER RE DISMISSAL

JAMES DONATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a federal prisoner in Arizona acting pro se, sent a letter to the Court alleging corruption in various Bay Area counties. In light of plaintiff's pro se status, the Court treated the letter as a complaint, and opened a new case for him. Plaintiff was sent a notice stating that he had not paid the filing fee, submitted a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or submitted a formal complaint. He was given twenty-eight days to act on one of these options.

More than twenty-eight days has passed, and plaintiff has not communicated with the Court. This case is dismissed without prejudice, and no fee or fee-related action is needed. If plaintiff wants to initiate a court case, he must file a formal complaint and pay the filing fee or submit a complete application to proceed IFP.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Lafaye

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 17, 2023
23-cv-03089-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2023)
Case details for

In re Lafaye

Case Details

Full title:LAFAYE, Plaintiff,

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 17, 2023

Citations

23-cv-03089-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2023)