From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re L. L. A.

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 27, 2009
209 P.3d 426 (Or. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 081171827; A140623.

Submitted May 1, 2009.

May 27, 2009.

Appeal from the Multnomah County Circuit Court. Connie L. Isgro, Judge pro tempore.

Rebecca Carter filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Harry B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.


Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to provide for her basic personal needs. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the judgment of involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to establish that, because of appellant's mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic personal needs and accept the concession.

Reversed.


Summaries of

In re L. L. A.

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 27, 2009
209 P.3d 426 (Or. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

In re L. L. A.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of L. L. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 27, 2009

Citations

209 P.3d 426 (Or. Ct. App. 2009)
209 P.3d 426