From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kuntze

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Jan 3, 2018
No. 10-17-00418-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 3, 2018)

Opinion

No. 10-17-00416-CV

01-03-2018

IN RE ULLJA KUNTZE


Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 14, 2017, Kuntze filed a document which is properly characterized as a petition for writ of mandamus. In a separate proceeding, In Re Kuntze, 10-17-00384-CV, we have explained that such a document is not filed within an existing appeal, but rather is docketed as its own proceeding. See In re Kuntze, 10-17-00384-CV, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 12038 (Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 27, 2017, orig. proceeding).

In this proceeding, Kuntze is critical of the Clerk of this Court for not responding to Kuntze's demands by the deadline set by Kuntze and for failing to notify the trial court clerk of what Kuntze perceives as deficiencies in the clerk's record. Kuntze seeks to have the Court's Clerk removed from office. Kuntze's complaint is frivolous. We do not have jurisdiction to remove the Clerk in this manner.

Kuntze's petition is dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins
Petition dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed January 3, 2018
[OT06]


Summaries of

In re Kuntze

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Jan 3, 2018
No. 10-17-00418-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 3, 2018)
Case details for

In re Kuntze

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ULLJA KUNTZE

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Jan 3, 2018

Citations

No. 10-17-00418-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 3, 2018)