However, there is no abuse of discretion if evidence of a "substantive and probative character" supports the trial court's order and the trial court correctly applies the law to the facts. In re K.N.C., 276 S.W.3d 624, 625 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.); see also Iliff, 339 S.W.3d at 78; In re K.S.H.U., No. 05-12-00448-CV, 2013 WL 2244344, at *2 (Tex. App.— Dallas May 21, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.). Because the traditional sufficiency standards of review overlap with the abuse-of-discretion standard in family law cases, legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence are not independent grounds of error, but are relevant factors in our assessment of whether the trial court abused its discretion.