Opinion
No. 109,829.
2014-03-14
For the reasons set out above, we affirm under Supreme Court Rule 7.042(b)(2), (3), and (5) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 64).
No. 109,829.
2014-03-14
For the reasons set out above, we affirm under Supreme Court Rule 7.042(b)(2), (3), and (5) (2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 64).
Full title:In the Matter of the EQUALIZATION APPEAL OF KRUEGER, Karen for the Year…
Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Date published: Mar 14, 2014