From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Krouner

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 11, 2017
150 A.D.3d 1466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

05-11-2017

In the Matter of Leonard W. KROUNER, a Disbarred Attorney. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Leonard W. Krouner, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 1501154).

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for petitioner. Leonard W. Krouner, Oceanside, California, respondent pro se.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for petitioner.

Leonard W. Krouner, Oceanside, California, respondent pro se.

Before: McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, ROSE, CLARK and AARONS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1973, and previously maintained an office for the practice of law in the City of Albany. He presently resides in Oceanside, California.

By order entered May 23, 2003, this Court disbarred respondent and struck his name from the roll of attorneys after he pleaded guilty to three felonies in Supreme Court in Albany County (305 A.D.2d 932, 759 N.Y.S.2d 402 [2003] ). He now moves for reinstatement, for the third time (see 114 A.D.3d 993, 979 N.Y.S.2d 857 [2014], 84 A.D.3d 1585, 922 N.Y.S.2d 816 [2011] ). Petitioner opposes the motion.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and due deliberation having been had thereon, we deny the motion, but without prejudice to the filing of a motion for reinstatement that complies with the requirements set forth in Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16(a) and Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) § 1240.16. Any such application shall include, among other things, submission of an affidavit in the form of Appendix C to Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] part 1240, such additional documentation as might be required in said form affidavit and proof that respondent has taken and successfully completed the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination no more than one year prior to the date of any future reinstatement motion.

ORDERED that respondent's motion is denied.

McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, ROSE, CLARK and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Krouner

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 11, 2017
150 A.D.3d 1466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Krouner

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Leonard W. KROUNER, a Disbarred Attorney. Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 11, 2017

Citations

150 A.D.3d 1466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
51 N.Y.S.3d 910

Citing Cases

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Krouner (In re Krouner)

30 [1]), and workers' compensation fraudulent practices, a class E felony (see Workers' Compensation Law § 96…

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Conlon (In re Conlon)

The application is deficient in other respects, including that it does not contain an affidavit that is…