Opinion
04-13-2017
Leon R. Koziol, New Hartford, respondent pro se.
Leon R. Koziol, New Hartford, respondent pro se.
Before: McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH, ROSE and DEVINE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Motion by respondent for an order setting aside the suspension orders issued by this Court dated September 23, 2010 and June 6, 2013 (107 A.D.3d 1137, 965 N.Y.S.2d 897 [2013], appeal dismissed and lv. denied 21 N.Y.3d 1056, 974 N.Y.S.2d 26, 996 N.E.2d 907 [2013], cert. denied ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 1038, 188 L.Ed.2d 122 [2014] ; 76 A.D.3d 1136, 907 N.Y.S.2d 697 [2010], lv. dismissed 15 N.Y.3d 943, 915 N.Y.S.2d 214, 940 N.E.2d 920 [2010], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 853, 922 N.Y.S.2d 267, 947 N.E.2d 159 [2011], cert. denied 565 U.S. 963, 132 S.Ct. 455, 181 L.Ed.2d 295 [2011] ), and other incidental relief.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and due deliberation having been had thereon, we deny the motion, but without prejudice to the filing of an application for reinstatement in compliance with the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16(a) and Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) § 1240.16.
ORDERED that respondent's motion is denied in its entirety.
McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., LYNCH, ROSE and DEVINE, JJ., concur.