From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Koonce

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Nov 25, 2015
Cause number: 01-15-00440-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 25, 2015)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-15-00440-CV

11-25-2015

In re Ernest Ray Koonce, Relator


ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: Opposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Parties filing motion: Real Party in Interest Wells Fargo Document to be filed: Response to Supplemental Mandamus Petition Is appeal accelerated? Yes (original proceeding). If motion to extend time:

Original due date: November 23, 2015
Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: November 23, 2015
Date Requested: December 7, 2015
Ordered that motion is:
[ ] Granted
[ ] Denied
[v] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
[v] Other: __________
Because the Real Party in Interest timely filed its response to the supplemental petition on November 23, 2015, its extension request is dismissed as moot. Pursuant to the Court's November 3, 2015 Order, relator's reply, combined with any response to Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss in No. 01-15-00228-CV, if any, must be filed within 20 days of Wells Fargo's response, or by December 14, 2015, but this Court may decide the case before a reply is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 38.6(c), 52.5.
Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: November 25, 2015 November 7, 2008 Revision


Summaries of

In re Koonce

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Nov 25, 2015
Cause number: 01-15-00440-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 25, 2015)
Case details for

In re Koonce

Case Details

Full title:In re Ernest Ray Koonce, Relator

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Nov 25, 2015

Citations

Cause number: 01-15-00440-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 25, 2015)