From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Konecranes, Inc.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Dec 1, 2017
NO. 14-17-00833-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 14-17-00833-CV

12-01-2017

IN RE KONECRANES, INC., Relator


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS
61st District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2015-27771

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 23, 2017, relator Konecranes, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Fredericka Phillips, presiding judge of the 61st District Court of Harris County, to vacate the portions of her orders which sustained objections to and denied relator's motion to compel documents responsive to Requests for Production 13, 14, 27, and 46, and information responsive to Interrogatories 2 and 19.

To obtain mandamus relief, a relator generally must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. We therefore deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby, and Donovan.


Summaries of

In re Konecranes, Inc.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Dec 1, 2017
NO. 14-17-00833-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2017)
Case details for

In re Konecranes, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KONECRANES, INC., Relator

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 1, 2017

Citations

NO. 14-17-00833-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2017)