From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Interest of K.M.

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Aug 17, 2016
886 N.W.2d 107 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

finding no abuse of discretion in the denial of a motion for continuance, although the parent was not present at the time of a CINA hearing

Summary of this case from In re C.D.

Opinion

No. 16–0778.

08-17-2016

In the Interest of K.M., N.M., L.M., H.M., and L.M., Minor Children, A.W., Mother, Appellant.

Christopher A. Clausen of Clausen Law Office, Ames, for appellant mother. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State. Meegan M. Langmaid–Keller of Keller Law Office, Altoona, for minor children.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Reversed and Remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

In re Interest of K.M.

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Aug 17, 2016
886 N.W.2d 107 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

finding no abuse of discretion in the denial of a motion for continuance, although the parent was not present at the time of a CINA hearing

Summary of this case from In re C.D.

acknowledging in other juvenile adjudications we "review subsidiary rulings for an abuse of discretion"

Summary of this case from In re D.C.
Case details for

In re Interest of K.M.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF K.M., N.M., L.M., H.M., and L.M., Minor Children, A.W.…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Aug 17, 2016

Citations

886 N.W.2d 107 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

In re M.B.

We determine the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to continue made by the…

In re C.D.

The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to continue made by the mother's…