finding a knowing violation of Rule 3.4(c) for assisting a Delaware accountant in violating a prior cease and desist order
Summary of this case from In re MartinNo. 138, 2008.
June 4, 2008.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Disbarred.
finding a knowing violation of Rule 3.4(c) for assisting a Delaware accountant in violating a prior cease and desist order
Summary of this case from In re Martinfinding a knowing violation of Rule 3.4(c) for assisting a Delaware accountant in violating a prior cease and desist order
Summary of this case from In re Martinfinding a knowing violation of Rule 3.4(c) for assisting a Delaware accountant in violating a prior cease and desist order
Summary of this case from In re Martindisbarring non-Delaware attorney whose failure to respond to ODC’s petition was deemed an admission of, among other things, the allegation that he violated Rule 3.4(c) by performing legal work for an accountant after the accountant was subject to a cease and desist order not to engage in the unauthorized practice of law
Summary of this case from In re Abbottdisbarring nonDelaware attorney whose failure to respond to ODC's petition was deemed an admission of, among other things, the allegation that he violated Rule 3.4(c) by performing legal work for an accountant after the accountant was subject to a cease and desist order not to engage in the unauthorized practice of law
Summary of this case from In re The Supreme Court of Del.knowing violation of Rule 3.4(c) for assisting Delaware accountant in violating prior cease and desist order
Summary of this case from In re KoysteFull title:In re Kingsley
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Jun 4, 2008
In re Abbott, 925 A.2d 482, 484 (Del.2007) (quoting In re Froelich, 838 A.2d 1117, 1120 (Del.2003)).In re…
Tanyous v. Happy Child WorldMr. Estep was later sanctioned for violating that order, In re Estep, 933 A.2d 763 (Del. 2007), and his…