From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Mktg. Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 22, 2024
8:22-ml-3052-JVS (KESx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2024)

Opinion

8:22-ml-3052-JVS (KESx)

07-22-2024

In re KIA HYUNDAI VEHICLE THEFT MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This document relates to ALL SUBROGATION CASES


JUDGMENT [502]

The Honorable James V. Selna United States District Judge

The Court, having dismissed all of the claims asserted against Defendants Hyundai Motor Company (“HMC”) and Kia Corporation (“KC”) for lack of personal jurisdiction for the reasons set forth in its July 5, 2024, Order (Dkt. 495), expressly finds, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that there is no just reason for delay, and therefore expressly directs the entry of final judgment as to HMC and KC:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Judgment is hereby entered on all of the claims against HMC and KC in favor of HMC and KC, and the Subrogation Plaintiffs shall recover nothing. The parties shall bear their own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Mktg. Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 22, 2024
8:22-ml-3052-JVS (KESx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2024)
Case details for

In re Kia Hyundai Vehicle Theft Mktg. Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re KIA HYUNDAI VEHICLE THEFT MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 22, 2024

Citations

8:22-ml-3052-JVS (KESx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2024)