In re Ketter

2 Citing cases

  1. In re Cassel

    322 B.R. 363 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 2005)   Cited 15 times
    Noting that a creditor's reliance is only relevant when the fraud complained of takes the form of a misrepresentation and that, when actual fraud is involved, reliance is subsumed within the determination as to whether the debtor tricked the creditor into extending credit

    Like the discharge exception, the added language was limited to the obtaining of credit. The provision was regarded as having no application to other types of liabilities, such as investments. See, In re Ketter, 1 B.R. 510 (E.D. Wis. 1979). Courts continued to hold that debts for money or property obtained by false oral representations were nondischargeable under the general language of Section 17(a)(2). Carini v. Matera, 592 F.2d 378 (7th Cir. 1979).

  2. In re Bedard

    19 B.R. 565 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1982)   Cited 9 times
    Comparing 11 U.S.C. § 523 and § 17 of the Bankruptcy Act of July 1, 1898 (11 U.S.C. § 35)

    See note 2, supra.In re Ketter, 1 B.R. 510 (D.C.E.D.Wis. 1979); In the Matter of Matera, 592 F.2d 378 (7th Cir. 1979). Act of July 1, 1898, ch. 541, 30 Stat. 544 (1898) (repealed by Act of Nov. 6, 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-598, 92 Stat. 2549 (1978)).