Like the discharge exception, the added language was limited to the obtaining of credit. The provision was regarded as having no application to other types of liabilities, such as investments. See, In re Ketter, 1 B.R. 510 (E.D. Wis. 1979). Courts continued to hold that debts for money or property obtained by false oral representations were nondischargeable under the general language of Section 17(a)(2). Carini v. Matera, 592 F.2d 378 (7th Cir. 1979).
See note 2, supra.In re Ketter, 1 B.R. 510 (D.C.E.D.Wis. 1979); In the Matter of Matera, 592 F.2d 378 (7th Cir. 1979). Act of July 1, 1898, ch. 541, 30 Stat. 544 (1898) (repealed by Act of Nov. 6, 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-598, 92 Stat. 2549 (1978)).