From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re K.D.M.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Sep 25, 2014
NO. 09-14-00170-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 25, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 09-14-00170-CV

09-25-2014

IN THE INTEREST OF K.D.M. AND K.D.M.


On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. C-208,666-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 2, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. On June 10, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. Appellant did not respond to the Court's notices.

Appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and has not shown that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal, and there being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the clerk's record, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

/s/_________

LEANNE JOHNSON

Justice
Submitted on September 24, 2014
Opinion Delivered September 25, 2014
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

In re K.D.M.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Sep 25, 2014
NO. 09-14-00170-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 25, 2014)
Case details for

In re K.D.M.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF K.D.M. AND K.D.M.

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Sep 25, 2014

Citations

NO. 09-14-00170-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 25, 2014)