In re Jupin

2 Citing cases

  1. In re Austin

    DRB 21-191 (N.J. Feb. 25, 2022)

    Thus, we determine to consider the demonstrable harm to Jakubiec as an aggravating factor. See, e.g., In the Matter of Angela Jupin, DRB 20-178 (April 27, 2021) (we considered significant economic harm to client as aggravating factor in recommending respondent's disbarment), dismissed as moot, __ N.J.__ (September 28, 2021); In re Saunders, 248 N.J. 272 (2021) (three-month suspension; default case; we considered significant harm caused to the client and respondent's repeated failures to cooperate with disciplinary authorities as aggravating factors warranting enhanced discipline in recommending a censure)

  2. In re Jupin

    DRB 20-342 (N.J. May. 26, 2021)

    On April 27, 2021, we determined to reprimand respondent for her violations of RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client). In the Matter of Angela Jupin, DRB 20-178 (April 27, 2021). That matter is pending with the Court.