From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Joseph Mastropietro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 2011
81 A.D.3d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 510129.

February 3, 2011.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Joseph Mastropietro, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ.


Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violent conduct, making threats, stalking and violating facility correspondence procedures. That determination was affirmed on administrative review, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Murphy v Boucaud, 78 AD3d 1417). Petitioner's request for reimbursement of the mandatory $5 surcharge is another matter and, inasmuch as the record does not demonstrate that such was refunded to his inmate account, he should be permitted to recoup this expense ( see Matter of Mathie v Selsky, 45 AD3d 1169, 1170).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $5.


Summaries of

In re Joseph Mastropietro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 3, 2011
81 A.D.3d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Joseph Mastropietro

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH MASTROPIETRO, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 3, 2011

Citations

81 A.D.3d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 602
916 N.Y.S.2d 848

Citing Cases

Shepherd v. Fischer

Given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the…

Oppenheimer v. Griffin

The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…