From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 2008
47 A.D.3d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2545.

January 15, 2008.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about July 5, 2007, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reducing the finding to attempted assault in the third degree, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Alan Beckoff of counsel), for presentment agency.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.


Appellant approached the victim in the hallway of their high school and hit him several times on the arm and back. Shortly thereafter, appellant entered the classroom in which the victim was sitting and, again, hit him several times, with a closed fist, on the arm and shoulder. The victim testified that he felt pain in his arm and back for several days thereafter, which interfered with his performance of some household chores. The victim, who apparently did not miss any school, first sought medical attention the day after the incident. The medical records indicated only a diagnosis of minor soft tissue trauma, for which Motrin was prescribed, without any bruising, reduction in range of motion, or other indication of injury.

By repeatedly punching the victim, and following him into a classroom to continue the attack, appellant demonstrated his intent to cause physical injury ( see Matter of Eric C., 281 AD2d 543). However, the evidence does not establish that the victim suffered impairment of physical condition or substantial pain ( see Penal Law § 10.00; People v Baksh, 43 AD3d 1072). The victim's testimony, viewed in light of the objective circumstances, does not warrant an inference of physical injury ( compare People v Chiddick, 8 NY3d 445). Accordingly, the evidence supports a finding of attempted, but not completed, third-degree assault.


Summaries of

In re Jose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 2008
47 A.D.3d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Jose

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSE B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 15, 2008

Citations

47 A.D.3d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 198
849 N.Y.S.2d 525

Citing Cases

People v. Tracy (William)

It is well settled that a defendant may be presumed to intend the natural consequences of his actions ( see…

People v. Roppoccio

In any event, we are of the opinion that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the…