In re Jordan

1 Citing case

  1. In re Chandler

    161 Ill. 2d 459 (Ill. 1994)   Cited 14 times
    Recognizing a continuing duty on every bar applicant to immediately disclose information relevant to the applicant's character and fitness as it becomes available

    Recently, this court was asked to consider whether probationary suspension under Supreme Court Rule 772 should be extended to an attorney who did not suffer from a disability. ( In re Jordan (1993), 157 Ill.2d 266.) In Jordan, the respondent forged the release of a hospital lien in order to expedite the payment to a client of settlement funds.