From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jordan

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 26, 2014
130 A.3d 950 (D.C. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14–BG–1001.

11-26-2014

In re Laura E. JORDAN, Respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law with the right to apply for reinstatement in eighteen months, see Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Jordan, 439 Md. 325, 96 A.3d 142 (2014), this court's September 24, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why the functionally equivalent discipline in the form of a suspension for a period of eighteen months, with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness, should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent filed timely affidavits as required by In re Goldberg, 460 A.2d 982 (D.C.1983), and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Laura E. Jordan is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of eighteen months, nunc pro tunc to August 18, 2014. Reinstatement is contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007).


Summaries of

In re Jordan

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 26, 2014
130 A.3d 950 (D.C. 2014)
Case details for

In re Jordan

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: LAURA E. JORDAN, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 416707

Court:DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Nov 26, 2014

Citations

130 A.3d 950 (D.C. 2014)

Citing Cases

In re Berry

PER CURIAM On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel's Report regarding petitioner's petition for…

In re Berry

PER CURIAM. On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel's Report regarding petitioner's petition for…