(dismissing the appeal only after notifying the parties of the court's intent to dismiss for failure to comply with Chapter 14 unless the inmate complied on or before a specified date); Hill v. State, No. 07–15–00157–CV, 2015 WL 4148273, at *1 (Tex.App.–Amarillo July 9, 2015, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem.op.) (stating the inmate was advised that he did not comply with the Chapter 14 filing requirements and was given ample time to cure defects in pursuing the appeal, but that the inmate ultimately failed to comply, resulting in dismissal of his appeal); In re Jones, 464 S.W.3d 874, 874–75 (Tex.App.–Beaumont 2015, no pet.) (orig.proceeding) (per curiam) (stating inmate was given notice of his petition's deficiencies and that a failure to cure would result in a dismissal of his suit as frivolous); Wilkerson v. Ramsey 1 Unit, No. 01–14–00790–CV, 2015 WL 1825802, at *2 (Tex.App.–Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 21, 2015, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem.op.) (dismissing the appeal only after notifying the inmate that his appeal was subject to dismissal unless he satisfied all of the Chapter 14 filing requirements and the inmate still failed to file a declaration of prior actions); Frey v. Foster, No. 06–13–00086–CV, 2014 WL 1004494, at *3 (Tex.App.–Texarkana Mar. 14, 2014, pet. denied) (mem.op.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1502, 191 L.Ed.2d 440 (2015) (explaining “[w]e noticed that [the inmate] had filed neither an affidavit or unsworn declaration of previous filings nor a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement on appeal” so “[w]e sent a letter to [the inmate] giving him the opportunity to cure