From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jones

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2018
No. 17-2276 (4th Cir. Apr. 23, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-2276

04-23-2018

In re: COREY THOMAS JONES, Petitioner.

Corey Thomas Jones, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:11-cr-00530-CMH-2; 1:14-cv-01493-CMH) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey Thomas Jones, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Corey Thomas Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has failed to rule on a number of motions and memoranda filed in his prior postconviction proceedings. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The underlying record demonstrates, however, that final orders have been entered in these postconviction proceedings, and the cited motions are no longer pending. Jones is therefore not entitled to mandamus relief. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Jones

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2018
No. 17-2276 (4th Cir. Apr. 23, 2018)
Case details for

In re Jones

Case Details

Full title:In re: COREY THOMAS JONES, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 23, 2018

Citations

No. 17-2276 (4th Cir. Apr. 23, 2018)