Opinion
F042763.
10-27-2003
In re JONATHAN H., A Person Coming Under The Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JONATHAN H., Defendant and Appellant.
Linda Buchser, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Carlos A. Martinez, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
THE COURT
The court adjudged appellant, Jonathan H., a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) after Jonathan admitted committing a battery offense (Pen. Code, § 242). On March 28, 2003, the court set Jonathans maximum term of confinement at six months and placed him on probation for a year on condition that he serve 90 days on the electronic monitoring program.
Jonathans appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Jonathan has not responded to this courts invitation to submit additional briefing.
Following independent review of the record, we have concluded that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist.
The judgment is affirmed. --------------- Notes: Before Vartabedian, Acting P.J., Wiseman, J., and Cornell, J.