Opinion
23-1040
02-24-2023
In re: DEANDRE JOHNSON, Petitioner.
Deandre Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:20-cv-00474-RAJ-LRL)
Submitted: February 21, 2023
Deandre Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Deandre Johnson petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to grant relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, which the district court denied in August 2022. We conclude that Johnson is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner "has no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires" and demonstrates "a clear and indisputable right" to that relief. Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted). Further, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).
The relief sought by Johnson is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED