From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Jan 22, 2004
135 S.W.3d 764 (Tex. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 01-04-00011-CV.

January 22, 2004.

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

R. Wayne Johnson, Amarillo, TX, for appellant.

Barbara Adamick, District Clerk, Montgomery County, Conroe, TX, for appellee.

Panel consists of Chief Justice RADACK and Justices JENNINGS and HIGLEY.


OPINION


On January 12, 2004, relator R. Wayne Johnson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus complaining of Montgomery County District Clerk Barbara Gladden Adamick.

A court of appeals or a justice of the court has jurisdiction to issue writs — other than writs of mandamus against a district or county court judge in the court of appeals district — only when necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the appellate court. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon Supp. 2004). Because (1) Montgomery County is in the Ninth Court of Appeals District, not in the First Court of Appeals District, (2) this is not a petition requesting this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against a district or county court judge, and (3) this is not a petition to enforce this Court's jurisdiction, we have no subject-matter jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus directed at Clerk Adamick. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.201(b), (j) (Vernon Supp. 2004).

Without reaching the merits of Johnson's petition for a writ of mandamus, we dismiss it for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

In re Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Jan 22, 2004
135 S.W.3d 764 (Tex. App. 2004)
Case details for

In re Johnson

Case Details

Full title:In re R. Wayne JOHNSON, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Jan 22, 2004

Citations

135 S.W.3d 764 (Tex. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

In re Washington

This Court's mandamus jurisdiction only reaches judges within this Court's geographic boundaries, except…

In re Frazier

This Court's mandamus jurisdiction only reaches judges within this Court's geographic boundaries, except…