From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wilkinson

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 2, 2018
2017-2199 (Fed. Cir. May. 2, 2018)

Opinion

2017-2199

05-02-2018

IN RE: JOHN WILKINSON, WCW, INC., Appellants

VICTOR J. BARANOWSKI, III, Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts LLP, Latham, NY, argued for appellants. Also represented by ARLEN L. OLSEN. SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/041,758.

JUDGMENT

VICTOR J. BARANOWSKI, III, Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts LLP, Latham, NY, argued for appellants. Also represented by ARLEN L. OLSEN. SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 2, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Wilkinson

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 2, 2018
2017-2199 (Fed. Cir. May. 2, 2018)
Case details for

In re Wilkinson

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: JOHN WILKINSON, WCW, INC., Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 2, 2018

Citations

2017-2199 (Fed. Cir. May. 2, 2018)