Opinion
13-24-00297-CV
07-02-2024
IN RE J&D CLAIMS SERVICES AND MARK STEVENS
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña
ORDER PER CURIAM
PER CURIAM
Relators J&D Claims Services and Mark Stevens filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by denying their motion to dismiss, or alternatively, by denying their motion for joinder of an indispensable party. Currently before the Court is a joint motion to stay the trial court proceedings pending our resolution of this petition for writ of mandamus.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the joint motion to stay, is of the opinion that it should be granted. We grant the joint motion to stay, and we order the trial court proceedings to be stayed pending the resolution of this original proceeding or further order of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10 ("Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.").