Summary
denying mandamus relief despite relators' challenge that trial court order granting new trial was “on erroneous and pretextual reasons”
Summary of this case from In re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Opinion
No. 05-11-01034-CV
Opinion issued August 30, 2011.
Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. DC-07-06369.
Before Chief Justice WRIGHT and Justices MOSELEY and FILLMORE.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators contend the trial judge granted a motion for new trial on erroneous and pretextual reasons. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus, unopposed motion for temporary relief, and amended emergency motion for temporary relief.