From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jayden S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 20, 2015
124 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

01-20-2015

In re JAYDEN S., A Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Kim C., Respondent–Appellant, Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families, Petitioner–Respondent.

Daniel R. Katz, New York, for appellant. John R. Eyerman, New York, for respondent. Karen Freedman, Lawyers for Children, Inc., New York (Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.


Daniel R. Katz, New York, for appellant.

John R. Eyerman, New York, for respondent.

Karen Freedman, Lawyers for Children, Inc., New York (Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.

Opinion Order, Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about September 30, 2013, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent mother had permanently neglected the subject child, terminated her parental rights and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence of respondent's failure to overcome her long term drug addiction. Although respondent participated in at least three detoxification programs, she repeatedly relapsed (see Matter of Jaileen X.M. [Annette M.], 111 A.D.3d 502, 974 N.Y.S.2d 440 [1st Dept.2013], lv. denied 22 N.Y.3d 859, 2014 WL 113785 [2014] ). In addition, her addiction caused her to be drowsy at numerous visits with the child and her testimony establishes that she fails to appreciate how her addiction adversely affects him.

The court properly determined that it is in the child's best interests to terminate respondent's parental rights and free him for adoption (Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147–148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). Since shortly after birth, he has resided in the home of his pre-adoptive foster parents, who love him and want to adopt him. The child has never lived with respondent, and after four years, he should not have to wait any longer to obtain permanency (see Matter of Jenna Nicole B [Jennifer Nicole B.], 118 A.D.3d 628, 987 N.Y.S.2d 851 [1st Dept.2014] ).

TOM, J.P., SAXE, FEINMAN, CLARK, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Jayden S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 20, 2015
124 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

In re Jayden S.

Case Details

Full title:In re JAYDEN S., A Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Kim…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 20, 2015

Citations

124 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 471
998 N.Y.S.2d 300