From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ja'Rell D.F.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 29, 2017
155 A.D.3d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2016–04907 Docket No. B–7893–14

11-29-2017

In the MATTER OF JA'RELL D.F. (Anonymous). Graham Windham Services to Families and Children, respondent; Charlence E.H. (Anonymous), appellant.

Geanine Towers, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant. Carrieri & Carrieri, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Ralph R. Carrieri of counsel), for respondent. Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Tamara A. Steckler and Amy Hausknecht of counsel), attorney for the child.


Geanine Towers, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Carrieri & Carrieri, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Ralph R. Carrieri of counsel), for respondent.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, N.Y. (Tamara A. Steckler and Amy Hausknecht of counsel), attorney for the child.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDERAppeal by the mother from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Barbara Salinitro, J.), dated March 14, 2016. The order, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, and upon the mother's default in appearing at the dispositional hearing, found that the mother permanently neglected the subject child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and the petitioner for the purpose of adoption.

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order of fact-finding and disposition as terminated the mother's parental rights and freed the child for adoption, upon her default in appearing at the dispositional hearing, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding to terminate the mother's parental rights to the subject child on the ground of permanent neglect. The mother appeared for a portion of the fact-finding hearing and testified on her own behalf. However, she defaulted in appearing at the dispositional hearing.

After the fact-finding and dispositional hearings, the Family Court found that the mother had permanently neglected the child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and the petitioner for the purpose of adoption. The mother appeals.

Contrary to the mother's contention, at the fact-finding hearing, the petitioner established, by clear and convincing evidence, that it made diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen her relationship with the child, in a manner specifically tailored to her individual situation (see Social Services Law § 384–b[7][a] ; [3][g][i]; Matter of Hailey ZZ. [Ricky ZZ.], 19 N.Y.3d 422, 429, 948 N.Y.S.2d 846, 972 N.E.2d 87 ; Matter of Sheila G., 61 N.Y.2d 368, 380–381, 474 N.Y.S.2d 421, 462 N.E.2d 1139 ). These efforts included, inter alia, making repeated referrals to mental health services, following up with and encouraging the mother's compliance with those programs, and attempting to facilitate visitation (see Matter ofShaquan D.M. [Shaquanna M.], 150 A.D.3d 1119, 1119–1120, 52 N.Y.S.3d 660 ; Matter of Lierre J.M. [Melissa L.D.], 150 A.D.3d 1009, 1010, 54 N.Y.S.3d 130 ; Matter of Tsulyn R.A. [Deborah A.], 135 A.D.3d 935, 26 N.Y.S.3d 533 ). Despite the petitioner's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parent-child relationship, the mother failed to regularly visit the child or plan for his future. Accordingly, the Family Court properly found that the mother permanently neglected the child (see Matter of Shaquan D.M. [Shaquanna M.], 150 A.D.3d at 1119–1120, 52 N.Y.S.3d 660 ; Matter of Lierre J.M. [Melissa L.D.], 150 A.D.3d at 1010, 54 N.Y.S.3d 130 ; Matter of Tsulyn R.A. [Deborah A.], 135 A.D.3d at 935, 26 N.Y.S.3d 533 ).

The mother may not appeal from the dispositional portion of the order of fact-finding and disposition in light of her default in appearing at the dispositional hearing (see Matter of Male G. [David D.], 121 A.D.3d 789, 790, 993 N.Y.S.2d 514 ; Matter of Jahira N.D. [Shaniqua S.S.], 111 A.D.3d 826, 826–827, 975 N.Y.S.2d 744 ). Accordingly, her appeal from that portion of the order of fact-finding and disposition must be dismissed.

RIVERA, J.P., COHEN, HINDS–RADIX and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Ja'Rell D.F.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 29, 2017
155 A.D.3d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Ja'Rell D.F.

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF JA'RELL D.F. (Anonymous). Graham Windham Services to…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 29, 2017

Citations

155 A.D.3d 1036 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
64 N.Y.S.3d 596