From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jansen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Nov 29, 2012
56 A.3d 497 (D.C. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12–BG–1146.

2012-11-29

In re Erwin R.E. JANSEN, Jr., Respondent.


Bar Registration No. 477715, BDN: 232–12.
BEFORE: EASTERLY, Associate Judge, NEBEKER and KING, Senior Judges.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, this court's August 20, 2012, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Erwin R.E. Jansen, Jr. is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).


Summaries of

In re Jansen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Nov 29, 2012
56 A.3d 497 (D.C. 2012)
Case details for

In re Jansen

Case Details

Full title:In re Erwin R.E. JANSEN, Jr., Respondent.

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Date published: Nov 29, 2012

Citations

56 A.3d 497 (D.C. 2012)