Opinion
05-24-01168-CV
12-18-2024
Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-03-05873-C
Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
In its October 2, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from a trial court order compelling real parties in interest to respond without objection to an agreed set of discovery requests and appear for deposition but otherwise denying relator's motion to reconsider certain post-judgment discovery orders.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relator's petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).