From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jani-King Of Hartford, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Dec 18, 2024
No. 05-24-01168-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2024)

Opinion

05-24-01168-CV

12-18-2024

IN RE JANI-KING OF HARTFORD, INC., Relator


Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-03-05873-C

Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

In its October 2, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from a trial court order compelling real parties in interest to respond without objection to an agreed set of discovery requests and appear for deposition but otherwise denying relator's motion to reconsider certain post-judgment discovery orders.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relator's petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Jani-King Of Hartford, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Dec 18, 2024
No. 05-24-01168-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2024)
Case details for

In re Jani-King Of Hartford, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JANI-KING OF HARTFORD, INC., Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Dec 18, 2024

Citations

No. 05-24-01168-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 18, 2024)