From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jamison

D.C. Court of Appeals
Aug 12, 2021
No. 21-BG-363 (D.C. Aug. 12, 2021)

Opinion

21-BG-363 Bar Registration 437771

08-12-2021

IN RE VANDY L. JAMISON, JR. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals


2020 DDN 212.

BEFORE: Thompson and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, Senior Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the state of Maryland placing respondent on inactive status by consent; this court's June 10, 2021, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why he should not be indefinitely suspended pursuant to a disability suspension under D.C. Bar R. XI § 13(e) as reciprocal discipline; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to the court order or the required D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Vandy L. Jamison, Jr. is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13(e). See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI § 13 (g) for reinstatement, as well as D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to the provisions of Rule XI § 16 (c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI § 14, including the filing of the required affidavit.


Summaries of

In re Jamison

D.C. Court of Appeals
Aug 12, 2021
No. 21-BG-363 (D.C. Aug. 12, 2021)
Case details for

In re Jamison

Case Details

Full title:IN RE VANDY L. JAMISON, JR. A Member of the Bar of the District of…

Court:D.C. Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 12, 2021

Citations

No. 21-BG-363 (D.C. Aug. 12, 2021)