From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re James Pettus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 2010
77 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-09158.

October 26, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondents to allow the petitioner to inspect, among other things, the grand jury minutes in a case entitled People v Pettus, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under indictment No. 6013/02, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

James Pettus, Pine City, N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders and Susan Anspach of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Covello, Santucci and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

In re James Pettus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 2010
77 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re James Pettus

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES PETTUS, Petitioner, v. GUY J. MANGANO, JR., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 2010

Citations

77 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7769
909 N.Y.S.2d 392