From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re James

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Apr 13, 2022
No. S273581 (Cal. Apr. 13, 2022)

Opinion

S273613

04-13-2022

JAMES (RONALD EUGENE) ON H.C.


The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary evidence]; In re Lessard (1965) 62 Cal.2d 497, 503 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that raise Fourth Amendment violations]; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege sufficient facts with particularity]; In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are repetitive].)


Summaries of

In re James

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Apr 13, 2022
No. S273581 (Cal. Apr. 13, 2022)
Case details for

In re James

Case Details

Full title:JAMES (RONALD EUGENE) ON H.C.

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Apr 13, 2022

Citations

No. S273581 (Cal. Apr. 13, 2022)