From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jade K.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2012
100 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-14

In the Matter of JADE K. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent; Herbie W. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Quincy K. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent; Herbie W. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2)

Regina G. Russell, Port Jefferson Station, N.Y., for appellant. Dennis M. Cohen, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Jeffrey P. Tavel of counsel), for respondent.


Regina G. Russell, Port Jefferson Station, N.Y., for appellant. Dennis M. Cohen, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Jeffrey P. Tavel of counsel), for respondent.
Steven Flaumenhaft, West Sayville, N.Y., attorney for the children.

In related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Herbie W. appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated January 11, 2012, as, after a hearing, granted the petition of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for a determination that he violated the terms of an order of supervision of the same court dated April 8, 2011, and committed him to a Suffolk County correctional facility for a term of incarceration, and (2), from a decision of the same court dated January 12, 2012.

ORDERED that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from a decision ( see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509, 472 N.Y.S.2d 718); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, and the petition is denied.

The evidence at the hearing did not establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the appellant willfully violated a prior order of supervision ( seeFamily Court Act § 1072; Matter of Dorf v. Alvalle, 76 A.D.3d 629, 630, 905 N.Y.S.2d 911;Matter of Rubackin v. Rubackin, 62 A.D.3d 11, 15, 875 N.Y.S.2d 90;Matter of Anonymous v. Anonymous, 222 A.D.2d 501, 501–502, 635 N.Y.S.2d 73). Accordingly, the Family Court erred in granting the petition.

MASTRO, J.P., LOTT, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Jade K.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2012
100 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

In re Jade K.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JADE K. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 14, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7670
953 N.Y.S.2d 870