From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jackson

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 5, 2014
568 F. App'x 892 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Opinion

2014-142

08-05-2014

IN RE MARK C. JACKSON, Petitioner.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:14-cv-00277-NBF, Judge Nancy B. Firestone.

ON MOTION

Before REYNA, BRYSON, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Mark C. Jackson petitions for a writ of mandamus relating to his complaint brought before the United States Court of Federal Claims.

On July 23, 2014, Jackson filed a notice of appeal, docketed as 2014-5121, from the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. A party who seeks a writ bears the burden of proving that he has no other means of obtaining the relief desired. Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989). Because Jackson may raise arguments concerning his case in his appeal, mandamus relief is not appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

(2) All pending motions are denied as moot.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court
s26


Summaries of

In re Jackson

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 5, 2014
568 F. App'x 892 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Case details for

In re Jackson

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MARK C. JACKSON, Petitioner.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 5, 2014

Citations

568 F. App'x 892 (Fed. Cir. 2014)