From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jackman

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 3, 2013
No. 05-12-01700-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No. 05-12-01700-CV

01-03-2013

IN RE ZOE MICHELLE JACKMAN, Relator


Writ of Mandamus Denied, Opinion issued January 3, 2013.

Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF07-10155-S


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices O'Neill, Francis, and Murphy

Opinion by Justice O'Neill

Relator contends the trial judge erred in awarding certain fees to an amicus attorney. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has an adequate remedy on appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.

_______________


JUSTICE
121700F.P05


Summaries of

In re Jackman

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 3, 2013
No. 05-12-01700-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 3, 2013)
Case details for

In re Jackman

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ZOE MICHELLE JACKMAN, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jan 3, 2013

Citations

No. 05-12-01700-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 3, 2013)