From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ja-Lynn Kuo

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jun 27, 2022
No. 05-22-00178-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-00178-CV

06-27-2022

IN RE JA-LYNN KUO; JLKUO, PLLC; SUBHO MULLICK; SM ER, PLC; SALIMA AMIN THOBANI; AND SRG CONSULTING, LLC, Relators


Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-02273

Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LESLIE L. OSBORNE JUSTICE

Before the Court are relators' petition for writ of mandamus and real party in interest's response. In the petition, relators challenge the trial court's order granting real party's motion to strike relators' jury demand and the trial court's order denying relators' motion for continuance.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relators lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding) (citing In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)). Based on our review of the petition, response, and the record, we conclude that relators 1 have failed to show an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 2


Summaries of

In re Ja-Lynn Kuo

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jun 27, 2022
No. 05-22-00178-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2022)
Case details for

In re Ja-Lynn Kuo

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JA-LYNN KUO; JLKUO, PLLC; SUBHO MULLICK; SM ER, PLC; SALIMA AMIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jun 27, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-00178-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 27, 2022)