From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re J. D.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Apr 14, 2022
No. 03-22-00182-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2022)

Opinion

03-22-00182-CV

04-14-2022

In re J. D.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Relator's filing, which we treat as a petition for writ of mandamus based on the substance of his filing, is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel, 997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (considering the substance of pleading rather than form or caption to determine its nature). 1


Summaries of

In re J. D.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Apr 14, 2022
No. 03-22-00182-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2022)
Case details for

In re J. D.

Case Details

Full title:In re J. D.

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Apr 14, 2022

Citations

No. 03-22-00182-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 14, 2022)