From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Interest of M.D.M.

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Mar 26, 2019
Appellate case number: 01-18-01142-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 26, 2019)

Opinion

Appellate case number: 01-18-01142-CV

03-26-2019

In the Interest of M.D.M., T.L.H. and J.D.B., Children


ORDER ON MOTION Trial court case number: CCL8785 Trial court: County Court at Law of Washington County

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue ("parental termination case"). The Clerk of this Court's March 1, 2019 notice notified Joshua S. Clover, the appointed counsel for both T.H., the presumed father of child T.L.H, and for J.K., the alleged father of child J.D.B., that his extension requests were granted to file appellants' briefs until March 18, 2019. On March 18, 2019, counsel filed appellant T.H.'s brief and filed this second unopposed motion for a 20-day extension of time to file appellant J.K.'s brief.

Although counsel stated that he filed appellant T.H.'s brief, it has not been received yet.

Appeals in parental termination cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed, so far as reasonably possible. See TEX. ST. JUD. ADMIN. R. 6.2(a) (West 2016). The notices of appeal in this case were timely filed on December 14, 2018, by the pro se appellant J.K., from the trial court's December 7, 2018 order of termination, and on December 20, 2018, by counsel for T.H., setting the 180-day compliance deadline for June 18, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). Although this is appellant J.K.'s second extension request and is unopposed, the accelerated schedule in parental termination cases requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines and greater scrutiny of extension requests. See, e.g., TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(b)(2) (stating that record extension requests in parental termination cases may be granted by appellate court, but must not exceed 30 days cumulatively, absent extraordinary circumstances).

Appellant J.K.'s counsel contends that a 20-day extension is needed for J.K.'s brief because, while he has been unable to obtain the missing pretrial hearings for J.K. and the court reporter has retired, he has reviewed the clerk's record and the remaining volumes of the reporter's record and can complete J.K.'s brief without the pretrial hearings. Thus, counsel requests 20 more days to file appellant J.K.'s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 38.6(d).

Accordingly, appellant J.K.'s second motion for an extension of time to file appellants' briefs are GRANTED for 20 days after the date of this Order, but no further extensions will be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).

It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: March 26, 2019


Summaries of

In re Interest of M.D.M.

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Mar 26, 2019
Appellate case number: 01-18-01142-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 26, 2019)
Case details for

In re Interest of M.D.M.

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of M.D.M., T.L.H. and J.D.B., Children

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Mar 26, 2019

Citations

Appellate case number: 01-18-01142-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 26, 2019)